Search This Blog

Do Not Disconnect - The Real Digital Divide

A grungy, oversaturated digital photograph of an Apple iPod with a fly resting on its click wheel, lying on top of a copy of The Economist whose cover reads 'The real digital divide.' Tangled white earbud cables and a Canon digital camera are visible around it.
The fly in the ointment, Opito Bay, around 2007.

This post was originally published in November, 2007. Almost two decades on, the photograph and the argument both feel — if anything — more relevant than they did then. I have updated this post lightly in May, 2026, some 19 years later!

The Photograph

I was on holiday in Opito Bay on New Zealand's Coromandel Peninsula, sitting on the couch in the place we were staying at. A friend's iPod was resting on the coffee table, on top of a copy of The Economist from March 2005, whose cover story happened to be titled "The Real Digital Divide." A fly landed on the iPod's click wheel and stayed there.

I reached for my camera, took the shot, and edited it later in Photoshop to give it the grungy, oversaturated look you see above. The fly on the iPod along with "The Real Digital Divide" struck me — immediately, and with a kind of embarrassing literalness — as the fly in the ointment.

The Original Digital Divide

"The Digital Divide" as a phrase had been around for nearly a decade by the time that Economist issue went to press. It described the gap between people with access to computers and the internet, and people without — a problem of poverty, infrastructure, geography, and inclusion. The Economist's leader article from 10 March 2005 argued, persuasively, that the way to bridge that divide wasn't cheap laptops but mobile phones, which were already reaching billions of people the PC era had skipped. (That link is a gift article, so you can read the original in full without an Economist subscription.)

That divide was real, and is still real. But I was struck even then that a second divide was quietly opening alongside it — and the fly on the iPod felt like exactly the right small reminder of it.

The Newer Divide Is Between Us and Each Other

The newer divide isn't between us and the technology. It's between us and the people standing right next to us.

Flash back to the late 1970s and 1980s, when the Sony Walkman and Discman were revolutionary. They offered something genuinely new: a portable, private soundscape that travelled with you. They also offered something genuinely strange — the social acceptability of standing in a crowd and not being there. By 2007 the iPod had succeeded the Walkman; by today, smartphones and earbuds have succeeded the iPod, and the bubble has only thickened.

Living in Southern California, with little public transportation, I've long felt the isolation that cars impose on a city. But the isolation isn't just physical now. Even in bustling urban centres, where mass transit hums with activity, people willingly cocoon themselves in music, podcasts, and glowing screens. The serendipity of public space — the overheard conversation, the chance recognition, the brief eye contact that becomes a chat — quietly empties out.

Social networking sites promise connection, but do they really bridge the gap? It seems that for every friend request accepted, there's a conversation lost to the hum of headphones and the pull of a screen. The irony isn't lost on me: as our digital networks expand, our real-world connections seem to wither.

A Small Reminder, Almost Two Decades On

When our devices tell us "Do not disconnect," I sometimes hear a plea in the message — not a technical instruction, but the voice of the ghost in the machine, reminding us of its dependence on our touch. In this dance between humanity and technology, who's really leading?

The fly on the iPod was nearly two decades ago. The iPod has long since gone the way of the Walkman. The Economist still publishes. The fly, presumably, is also no longer with us. And the divide it accidentally illustrated is, if anything, wider.

Perhaps it's time to pause, unplug, and reconnect — not just to our devices, but to each other. A walk in a local park or garden with your camera, perhaps?

Available on Redbubble

If the image resonates, the original photograph is available on Redbubble as a notebook and on other products. If you're truly brave, perhaps you would like to order it printed on a smartphone case! 😆 — a small daily reminder of the fly in the ointment.

👉 The Real Digital Divide — Notebook on Redbubble

View all my work on Redbubble by searching @kornkobart.

Comments

Most popular posts in the last 30 days

Pink Bromeliad #4 aechmea fasciata

Pink Bromeliad (aechmea fasciata) This beautiful bromeliad is flowering in a pot on my patio at the moment. I guess it must like my garden. I had it sitting under some trees in a pretty shady but bright spot for most of the last year since one of my neighbors moved and gave it to me. Once I saw all the blooms coming I moved it into the sun while it puts on its show. Its common name is urn plant or urn flower, and its botanical name is bromeliad aechmea fasciata. These plants are related to the pineapple, did you know? Please feel free to post any comments.

What is Bokeh?

Columbine at the Huntington Library gardens, shot at f/4.5 to throw the background into bokeh. © John Corney A photograph I took of columbines at the Huntington Library gardens recently has such a beautiful bokeh effect that I thought I'd use it as an excuse to talk about bokeh today — what it is, where the word comes from, and how to get it in your own photographs. What Bokeh Actually Is The word bokeh comes from the Japanese word boke (暈け), meaning "blurred" or "haze." It started being used by photographers in the late 1990s to describe specifically the quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photograph — not just the fact that the background is blurred, but how aesthetically the blurring is rendered. Good bokeh is creamy, smooth, and pleasing. Bad bokeh is harsh, distracting, or busy. Two lenses can produce the same depth of field but very different bokeh. It's pronounc...

National Wildlife Federation 2010 Photo Contest Submission

I have finally finished selecting and submitting my entries for this year's National Wildlife Federation photo contest. I submitted 25 entries in total in the mammals, birds, other wildlife, and plant categories. I put together this video presentation of my entries which can be viewed in HD  here at YouTube . Below is a low-definition version. If you'd like to join in the fun and submit your own entries, you have until July 6th to do so. Here's a link to the competition website .

Bryce Canyon Rock Warrior

While walking back up from the bottom of the Queen's Garden Trail back to Sunrise Point I noticed that in this rock formation I could make out the face of a Mayan or Aztec warrior chief. If you click on this image and look just below the center of the bigger image hopefully you'll be able to make him out. He has a big nose and a high headdress. It was a pretty amazing sight. I wonder if other people have ever picked this out. I think a lot relied on the shadows that were being cast at the time by the sun. Perhaps it doesn't look like a warrior if the shadows aren't just right. Bryce Canyon National Park website

Waterlily

Waterlily - Toned (c) John Corney 2009 Waterlily rendered in black and white with yellow split-toning. Subscribe by email Your subscription will begin only after you activate it by responding to the email you will receive from "FeedBurner Email Subscriptions" immediately after submitting this request. If you do not see the email within the next minute, please check your spam folder.