Search This Blog

Surely Not Everybody Was Kung-Fu Fighting? — A Small Collection of Sceptical Disco Art

A vintage-style sepia illustration of a mustachioed disco-era man dancing on a lit dance floor with a disco ball behind him, one hand raised and pointing upward, the other in a loose fist. Bold black text below reads 'Surely not everybody was kung-fu fighting?' — a small sceptical response to Carl Douglas's 1974 disco hit.
Vintage sepia illustration — one of three designs in the collection.

Something has always bothered me about the opening claim of Carl Douglas's 1974 disco hit "Kung Fu Fighting." Not the song — the song is a joy — but the sweeping declaration at the start. Everybody was kung fu fighting. Everybody? Really? All of us? The dentists? The librarians? Somebody's grandmother? At the same time? That seems like a strong claim to make about a global population of roughly four billion people in 1974.

I decided to make some art gently disagreeing.

A Small Collection of Sceptical Disco Art

The joke is simple. A disco-era character, mid-move on a lit dance floor, with bold text asking the reasonable question — surely not everybody was kung-fu fighting? It's the kind of quiet, literal-minded rebuttal that pop songs frequently invite but rarely receive.

I ended up making the joke three different ways, in three different visual styles, because part of the fun was seeing how the same sceptical question could carry different atmospheres.

The Vintage Sepia Version

The first is a warm, cream-and-sepia vintage illustration — a mustachioed disco dancer clearly doing his own thing on the dance floor, participating in whatever wasn't kung-fu fighting. Drawn in the register of an old print, textured like something you'd find in a 1970s magazine ad. This is the driest version of the joke, and probably the one that reads best on a mantelpiece or in a home office.

Available on Redbubble as posters, art prints, stickers, greeting cards, and more.

The Sepia Version

The Retro Movie Poster Version

A bold retro-poster-style illustration of a fierce Black woman in a red jumpsuit executing a high kick on a colourful disco floor, with a spinning disco ball behind her and coloured light rays radiating outward. Yellow vintage typography reads 'Surely not everybody was kung fu fighting?' — styled after 1970s pulp movie posters.
Retro movie poster style — bold, saturated, and unapologetically dramatic.

The second version is a bold, saturated retro-poster illustration — a fierce woman in a red jumpsuit delivering a high kick beneath a disco ball, drawn in the visual language of 1970s pulp movie posters. The whole composition is treated with complete visual seriousness, which is what makes the joke land. If everybody really was kung-fu fighting, this is roughly what the poster would have looked like.

This one works particularly well as a large art print or poster — the composition wants room to breathe.

The Poster Version

The Comic Book Version

A comic-book-style illustration of a fierce Asian woman in a floral orange shirt and orange flared trousers, delivering a high kick on a lit disco dance floor beneath a disco ball, with radial sunburst lines behind her. Bold cream-coloured text reads 'Surely not everybody was kung fu fighting?' — drawn in the visual style of vintage comic book panels.
Comic book panel style — strong outlines, flat colour, and a sunburst behind the kick.

The third takes the same idea into the visual vocabulary of vintage comic book panels — strong black outlines, saturated flat colour, radial sunburst lines behind the figure. A fierce woman in a floral orange shirt and flared trousers, delivering a decisive high kick, drawn as if she were about to appear on the cover of a graphic novel about a disco martial artist. This is the most graphically bold of the three, and reads brilliantly at any size.

The Comic Book Version

Who It's For

This collection is for a specific kind of person. Someone who likes the small pleasure of taking pop songs a little more literally than they were meant to be taken. Someone who owns at least one thing on their wall that requires the visitor to think about it for two seconds before laughing. Someone whose humour runs slightly dry, slightly generational, slightly affectionate toward the disco era rather than dismissive of it.

If that person is you — or if that person is someone you're shopping for — one of these three should do it. Each one is available as posters, art prints, stickers, greeting cards, notebooks, mugs, and other paper and hard-goods products across the Redbubble range.

You can find all my work at my Redbubble shop, KornKob Art — or search Redbubble for kornkobart (one word).

Comments

Most popular posts in the last 30 days

Pink Bromeliad #4 aechmea fasciata

Pink Bromeliad (aechmea fasciata) This beautiful bromeliad is flowering in a pot on my patio at the moment. I guess it must like my garden. I had it sitting under some trees in a pretty shady but bright spot for most of the last year since one of my neighbors moved and gave it to me. Once I saw all the blooms coming I moved it into the sun while it puts on its show. Its common name is urn plant or urn flower, and its botanical name is bromeliad aechmea fasciata. These plants are related to the pineapple, did you know? Please feel free to post any comments.

What is Bokeh?

Columbine at the Huntington Library gardens, shot at f/4.5 to throw the background into bokeh. © John Corney A photograph I took of columbines at the Huntington Library gardens recently has such a beautiful bokeh effect that I thought I'd use it as an excuse to talk about bokeh today — what it is, where the word comes from, and how to get it in your own photographs. What Bokeh Actually Is The word bokeh comes from the Japanese word boke (暈け), meaning "blurred" or "haze." It started being used by photographers in the late 1990s to describe specifically the quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photograph — not just the fact that the background is blurred, but how aesthetically the blurring is rendered. Good bokeh is creamy, smooth, and pleasing. Bad bokeh is harsh, distracting, or busy. Two lenses can produce the same depth of field but very different bokeh. It's pronounc...

National Wildlife Federation 2010 Photo Contest Submission

I have finally finished selecting and submitting my entries for this year's National Wildlife Federation photo contest. I submitted 25 entries in total in the mammals, birds, other wildlife, and plant categories. I put together this video presentation of my entries which can be viewed in HD  here at YouTube . Below is a low-definition version. If you'd like to join in the fun and submit your own entries, you have until July 6th to do so. Here's a link to the competition website .

Bryce Canyon Rock Warrior

While walking back up from the bottom of the Queen's Garden Trail back to Sunrise Point I noticed that in this rock formation I could make out the face of a Mayan or Aztec warrior chief. If you click on this image and look just below the center of the bigger image hopefully you'll be able to make him out. He has a big nose and a high headdress. It was a pretty amazing sight. I wonder if other people have ever picked this out. I think a lot relied on the shadows that were being cast at the time by the sun. Perhaps it doesn't look like a warrior if the shadows aren't just right. Bryce Canyon National Park website

Waterlily

Waterlily - Toned (c) John Corney 2009 Waterlily rendered in black and white with yellow split-toning. Subscribe by email Your subscription will begin only after you activate it by responding to the email you will receive from "FeedBurner Email Subscriptions" immediately after submitting this request. If you do not see the email within the next minute, please check your spam folder.